09 October, 2009
  • ArtWanted.com Staff
  • 1,723 Views
  • 16 Comments

Small Change in Statistics Tracking

Over the last few months, we have really been studying the web traffic we get to our site. We have discovered that there are a lot of search spiders/robots that are surfing the site to index our pages in search engines (like Google, Yahoo & Bing).

This is a good thing, because it will get your ArtWanted.com portfolio ranked higher in the search engine pages. However, there is one problem. Often these robots will record a hit to your portfolio images, when it was not "technically" a real person looking at your artwork.

In the last week, we have changed the tracking of your portfolio, so that these robots/spiders will no longer record a "hit" to your images or portfolio. While this may decrease the number of hits some of you see on your stats reports, we feel that it's a more accurate number to report to you.

Keep in mind that this does not mean that fewer people are looking at your art, only that we are filtering out the automated bots that scan our site daily.

On a related note, the research we have been doing is in preparation for some new stats reports that will be coming out soon. Stay tuned...

Reply

16 Comments

marlene burns 14 Oct 2009

the new. 'real ' number will be very sobering..... i think lots of artists will be shocked to discover that the traffic isn't human....

PAUL DAVIES 15 Oct 2009

I agree - my hits have dropped like a stone!!

Roy Boobyer 16 Oct 2009

Same here! I shall have to stop congratulating myself:-)))))

marlene burns 16 Oct 2009

"it does not mean that fewer people are looking at your art...."

what it does mean is that very few real people were ever looking at our art.

how will this impact artwanteds numbers of hits in terms of being a great site for traffic?

Cassie Norwood 17 Oct 2009

Do you submit your art work to any other online portfolio sites (such as Deviantart.com?) you could always sign up and compare traffic stats. You don't get individual image stats with DA but you can see how many people came that day.

marlene burns 17 Oct 2009

i'm with fineartamerica and they will be eliminating bots and search engines as well. i alos have a flag counter for country stats. go to flagcounter.com to download one for free.

RDCruz 23 Oct 2009

Kk, thanx!

Margie De-Faria 24 Oct 2009

It sort of was disturbing and I lost my excitement about doing anything anymore for such low percentages.

L Anderson 28 Oct 2009

I think that's great. Inflated numbers are meaningless.

Miles Baker 06 Nov 2009

Lets hope that the TRUTH won't HURT!

bert cortes 08 Nov 2009

Not that it matters to me, but the hits are absolutely insane. In July I show 22,000; Sept.2500 and Oct about 3,000. I think the system is going loco, but don't bother for I care less about hits.

announi abdelali 10 Nov 2009

pas juste du tout.... je connais des ecoles de 300 etudiants aves 2 pc pour eux tous et lors d'une de maes exposition ils ont presque tous vus chacun son tour ma gallerie sur le meme pc

Johnny M 08 Dec 2009

*To give my honest opinion about this...I used to get thousands of downloads a day on every site my works were on, and that number has dropped like a rock asteroid in the ocean...but...it didn't matter to me then, and doesn't bother me now...because...the reason I do the work I create is that I simply love the work and the idea of creating something from nothing...that means everything to me! Happy Holidays!

Edward Woolley 16 Dec 2009

I always felt there was some repeat and non-human elements out there, bretending to be real, so this just makes the real people out there, much more real and much closer to an honest opinion, and that means more to me then how many.

Leyla Murr 20 Dec 2009

On this site I get very few hits for some reason, like 1 a week! On my best site I get 11000 per month! It just shows me what the site owners are doing ie how they are promoting the website. I am not obsessed with hits as long as art sells.

Maria Murphy 20 Dec 2009

Yes this is good.The truth is always best !!!

Reply