91 Comments (Page 3)

Gayla Drummond 11 Oct 2006

Lee suggested exactly what I thought of this morning, lol. Auctions! Listing fees would provide an extra source of income, and is there another site that has dedicated art auctions that gets the traffic AW does?

Dump the dead accounts first, see what that does. Then, work on the look of the site a bit...add those extra categories, etc. THEN, see about adding an auction area.

I'll promote the heck out of it. I'll donate to the cost of the software, if you have to buy something specialized for that (though I don't think you'd have to, seems like there's some open source stuff that could be used). =)

(Edit: I've peeped at 262 accounts so far, and 139 of them were 'dead'...no uploads this year, whatsoever.)

bianca 11 Oct 2006

AW.....the sites i am on and was on do not allow NON PAID MEMBERS....only guest accounts.....guest can look around, but cant upload....GET RID OFF non paying members, GET RID OFF dead accounts if they are not paying....GET RID OFF ....set TRIAL 30 days accounts...max....PROMOTE your site to the buyers.....you have to promote, you have to bring buyer in....also give so much free space to paid members after that we all have to pay for aditional space....comon there is no free lunch...and AW is in business to make money....No one will broke bank account to pay for it....Nothing is for free today....AW have to look for their own interest...There is so many sites out there that are by invitation ONLY....and they are making bucks...you will loose lots of members if your site keeps going down...Let have a SURVEY so you can get feedback...some of us are not just working people.....some of us are business people and have experience in the business world...maybe idea or two would help...

Gayla Drummond 11 Oct 2006

I posted some suggestions...some were posted by others, a couple are ideas I've seen in effect at other sites or use myself on my sites. =)

http://www.artwanted.com/mb/topic.cfm?Topic=315273

jennifer blenkinsopp 11 Oct 2006

Gaylor the auction Idea I suggested a while ago but as usual was ignored, this will generate more funds for AW, and give the artists on here more promotion and sales, we all will have artworks that are surplus, look at the auction Wendy kathi and Karen organised, it was a huge succsess--sp,---------as far as non paying members who are insisting its princible for not allowing nudity, is just a excuse not to pay,--------- why should the paying members pay more,----------give them a ultamatim pay or get out.

Karen Godin 11 Oct 2006

ArtWanted needs to decide what it wants to be. From what I understand, it was initially put together as an "artists community", rather than a sales-focused art site. Now, it seems to be moving toward the sales/professional focus. The dilemma they are facing reflects this transition.

Basic housekeeping appears to be a given (get rid of the obsolete accounts to release bandwith, etc).

Now, they need to re-structure their membership options to reflect the use of their clientele. Free trial period for everyone, Basic Membership (nominal fee for those that just want to play on the forums/amateur works/casual uploads), and Premium (sales based).

The Premium Membership should have considerably higher benefits for those that want to sell & the services/categories etc should cater to those needs...separating those works clearly from the non-selling artists.

This is a TRANSITION period - until Andy decides what he actually wants AW to be, no business plan can be put into place. I'd be interested to know how HE sees the site now. If he just wants it to remain as simply an "artist's community", with sales as a mere by-product, then...we can't expect anyone to accept more than what he's offered (as it's been offered).

Gayla Drummond 11 Oct 2006

Glass wench is a smart wench. =)

Roz Eve 11 Oct 2006

I must agree that this site is wonderful.I was free only two months and became serious and bought a membership. Why let people on for free if it will cost the paying members more.If you want to give a trial free period of three or four months to exite new members that makes sense.People find funding to put thier work into art contests at more than $30.00 dollars and the only people seeing thier work are judges and in most cases its a complete waste of money.The judges aren't buying your work. You can sell prints and get seen here! I also agree that It Makes sense to charge those who use the service the most the ones that have over 100 images should pay more for each 100 or 500 more. Also the people who do photography and digital images seem to have a distinct advantage of coming up more often on the home page because they can produce vast quantites of work. Is there some way to even the playing field a bit for the rest of us? I understand your not wanting to drop how many artists are on the site but if that is the concern you could allow free people One image Including the ones who haven't posted for a year and if you can't reach them you pick the image. I seems you have allot of options What ever you decide is good by me.You are fair and prompt and have a great community here.Thanks for everything.

Beth Melamed 11 Oct 2006

Some of the postings by users on this thread reguarding us free users as "freeloaders" is very disheartening. When I joined this site many years ago, I joined because of the small community, the more mature, older users (hence avoiding a lot of teenybopper traced/eyeballed art), and the quick responses by the mods if one ever had a question.

But the reaction of some on this thread has changed my opinion, at leat on the feeling of community. I thought this site was about about bringing artists together, to share our work. I feel like free users like myself are being attacked because we don't or can't spend money to keep this site going. It's like, if you don't have the money, get the ~bleep~ out, who cares how much you've uploaded or how active you are in the forums, you aren't worth keeping around.

I know I'm in the minority, but like I said before, if this site would go paid members only, I'd have to leave. I like this website, but just out of college and looking for a full time job, $39 for a year of premium memembership is not something I can spend freely. Even if I had the money to spend, would I spend it here? The perks of a premium memebership do not compare to what other sites offer, who have much less restrictions uploading for free accounts and who's paid memeberships offer far more perks.

Perhaps that's why those sites are doing better than AW - you get more for your dollar. It's not like I'm against AW or want to see it go down in proveribal flames - it would be a business decision in the end, where would my money better be spent?

In the end I have to agree with Karen - AW has to figure out what it wants to be - a commuity for artists to come together or a sales/money focused site. And if the focus is going to be on making a profit, well, that's something I didn't sign up for.

hosanna lowe 11 Oct 2006

I agree with Beth. Sadly, it seems the overall feeling of the paying members is that free members are losers & freeloaders. What we are, in reality, are artists who were happy to find a site that offered free publicity, with no time restrictions to the free membership; although of course we have to censor any nudity. For those artists who don't create nudes, try to imagine being required to "black out" the leaves or petals on your flowers, or the shadows on your landscapes, or the eyes on your animals or portraits. Understanding & abiding by the rules makes sense, because it is still FREE. But, is it worth PAYING for? To those of us who don't have $30 to throw around, even once a year, it's something to consider. And paid members, please remember, when you paid for your membership, you understood that there was a free membership as well, with limited uploads. You wanted to be able to add as many images as you could at any given time, so you paid for it. There are several perks available to paying members that are not available to free members, so please enjoy your membership without making yourselves out to be better than those of us who CHOSE to accept the offer for free.

I do feel that if payment was required, censorship should be lifted. I do love the site; I have only experienced a few problems as far as downtime, and an apology was never expected -- it was a pleasant surprise. I refer people to AW as much as I can, to become members or to look for artwork to buy. But, I have found other sites that are free to join and do not have a limit of images per month, and have had some luck with exposure there as well. AW is, however, more "human" than these sites, which is why I tend to spend more time on it.

AW: Please consider the options and information put before you in this discussion, there are many great suggestions.

Patrick Miller 11 Oct 2006

I agree with Hosanna 100%. If the rules and puritanial moral code don't effect what you do, then go with it. If it does it is another story isn't it?

Kathi Perry 11 Oct 2006

I am a paying member, but have given thought to why I do pay as I don't post a lot of work. I do believe that if you allow a mature content area on your site and make it manditory for those posting nudes to become paying members that you will definitely see an increase in your paid memberships.

Just food for thought.

Gayla Drummond 11 Oct 2006

I vote for nudity allowed...did so on that poll AW has up/had up. When do we see some results from that?

I sincerely hope no one feels that I think our active free members are freeloaders, because I don't. I think all those portfolios belonging to free members who haven't been here in 1-6 years are free loaders, lol. =)

Karen Godin 11 Oct 2006

Hosanna & Beth...I don't think that the "overwhelming majority" have a problem with NON-paying members - there are just a few LOUD voices that make it appear so.

Everybody here has chosen from the options offered to them by this site. I think everyone contributes in their own way & for their own reasons.

Don't let the LOUD voices throw you...

=}

Kathi Perry 11 Oct 2006

I have absolutely no problem with non paying members, as a matter of fact many of them have become friends because of this site. Like I have said over and over I could care less whether a person pays or not, life is too damn short to worry about what others do.

I think that incentive is a good way to get people too pay. This way even the non paying members can still post their work and be active members of the boards.


ArtWanted.com Staff 11 Oct 2006

Thanks for all the feedback that has been mentioned on this topic. We are reading each response and making notes on many of your suggestions.

First off, we don't want to create a separation between free and paying members. It's our decision to have free and paying accounts and we don't want fights or angry feelings toward the members of our site over the type of account they have. If we offer free accounts, you can't get upset at someone for taking what we offer. :-)

We do plan to make some changes to the account type structure we have now, but we have not decided the exact changes we will make or when they will go live on the site.

Feel free to continue to post your feedback, but lay off the attacks on other members, based off their account type. This is an art community to build friendships of other artists, not make enemies.

chuck vest 12 Oct 2006

I was very surprised to read that only 5% are Premium Members. When I found this site I was so impressed with all it offered, as well as how it's set up I couldn't wait to become a paying member. As far as other sites that offer free exposure....I've checked out many and I haven't found one near the quality of this one. Thanks for the great site, I'd pay again and again. I say pitch the freebies. If I scraped up the fee anyone can.

Gayla Drummond 12 Oct 2006

I have to say, I've had more exposure from AW than ANY other site I have a portfolio up on. More traffic to my website, and I've been contacted for commissions and illustrative work, etc, by people who've seen my work here.

That, in my opinion, makes AW the best site of its type online, at least for me, which is a good reason I keep paying, and am eager to support this site. It does, and has, been working for me.

I appreciate the fact that Andy and Co. are willing to listen to our suggestions and make some changes based on them. Thanks! =)

Karen O'Brien 12 Oct 2006

Could you not increase the price for old members. atm I am on a strict budget being uneployed and doing volunteer work to get paid.

bill luke 12 Oct 2006

In My opinion We need to post Notice in Recent News section as follows,Burial Services to be held on this website for ALL DEAD ACCOUNTS [6 months inactive or more].Let's bury the dead.The rest of the answers will follow in due time.

Southern Charm Photography 13 Oct 2006

I've been watching and reading all the responses here over the last week since the outtage last weekend. I'm not at all surprised by the reactions of many who are fed up with the performance of this site. It happens often. People get fed up with lots of the issues that this site continues to experience. I certainly don't see where fighting and pointing fingers of blame at AW or anyone else will solve the problems nor will bullying AW into making changes that they quite obviously do not wish to make. The site is what it is, take it or leave it. It's not in the members' powers to change things, BUT we could all certainly do our part by presenting ourselves with our best foot forward in making it the best it could be until things improve, right? To start, many of us (yes, I speak for those who don't want to be attacked!) would like to see more:

1. Concentration on what's good about the site. Stop knit-picking all the bad stuff apart and get off your butts and do some thing positive for a change.

2. More people offer assistance to AW to help with issues that many or all of us can help with; i.e. reporting images that break the rules, message board problems, email AW over the weekend when the site goes down, offer to moderate voluntarily. Some of you may regard this as snitching and being a tattle-tale. Too bad! Break the rules and what do you expect?? Rules are here for a reason. Look at the General Discussion board any day of the week and you'll see exactly why there have to be rules.

3. More art and participation in all areas about the art and other points of interest that are within the guidelines; not the fights, disagreements and all the negativity that lives and breeds more negativity. Keep it positive and be a good example.

What many would like to see less of:

1. Fights on the boards. The site is for everyone and shouldn't be a place to vent your frustrations on the world. Email your buddies on the message boards instead. See a professional, or whatever it takes. Freedom of speech does not encompass pissing off a majority of the membership by starting fights on the message boards that clearly break the rules. We are a versatile group here and many read but don't touch because of the demeanor of a few very opinionated and otherwise unpleasant contributions that many resent.

2. Controversial comments or threads. Add something positive or at least comment on topic or leave it alone. Don't hijack someone's thread simply because you disagree. Start your own if you have to but keep it clean. Everyone has a right to their own opinions but many opinions are what start verbal fights. Some things truly are best kept to yourselves. If you see a thread that breaks the rules, it's best to simply avoid it and report it or you too will more than likely also receive warnings from AW. If it continues, AW may just start throwing people off the message boards again or worse yet, close them down for good.

3. Ragging on AW. Until AW sees the positive moral support here, why would anyone expect more from them just because you pay a fee of $3-5 a month. Those who don't contribute?? Well, you are right that AW has offered their services for free but does that give you rights to complain? I can't say for many why they do anything. I support this site because I choose to and I do feel the differences between a free account and paid are worthwhile. I feel I should contribute. Some may not and that's fine. I understand that AW's original intentions were to provide a place for children to come and post their work, learn and view other art at all levels. I'm quite sure they still have valid reasons for the choices they make. It IS their site, right? Once again, we all have opinions about any or all of this. Paying or not paying here is kind of like not voting for politicians....... if you don't vote then what can you really say that holds any real value if you didn't financially support the site to start with?? And those who do pay, it's not your call to tell others they should until AW changes their policies. It's all been said before.

4. Belittling - enough is enough. I choose to ignore it and I plan on staying and will continue to ignore the few who do it but what must new members think when they read this garbage? It's nice to see a few new names here and there, but there are many, many who do not participate by choice. I personally have unsolicited emails from many about why they don't go to the message boards and even a few about the rude anonymous comments left by a few. Wonder who that could be?? I don't have to wonder. I've experienced it myself! Comments on the message boards speak volumes about people and character. It's not rocket science to read between the lines.

5. Less game-playing and more adult behavior. Perception is 9/10ths of reality to viewers, all ages, all walks of life.

Everyone is here for one reason or another. Many are for art, some are not. That's fine but learn to respect one another. Let's all work together to find a solution rather than creating more problems, OK?

Now, those of you who wish to attack me for having an opinion once again, please go do so and announce to the world who you are once again. :-)