Cant deny that Acrylics dry quickly and they have an advantage, especially when having to work on a commission in limited time. But i found that the colors faded when they dried and I had to keep adjusting things for this. Also white acrylic has to be put on very thick for it to prevent being weak and translucent.
Oils are good to work wet in wet also, and i like to alter things and keep things moving even after a few days.
I wouldnt have been able to get the clarity in this painting if i had done it in acrylics.
you are the second person to ask me why i draw so lightly lol...i've never noticed that...they look ok in person....could be the mechanical pencil i use or the paper...another thing could be is they come out that way when i scan them..
Hi Allen and everyone! First of all, I am glad to see you come to ArtWanted Allen. You are a great addition and really talented to boot! As I have said on another post, I think your work is "top-notch!"
To answer your question, I don't know what medium is best. That is up to each of you. I worked strictly in graphite since I was just a little kid. I hadn't picked up a brush in years, when I did it was to paint with watercolors. I went through a time period in the late 1970's that I couldn't paint enough old barns to satisfy all that wanted them. I burnt out quickly. In 2003 I started producing western portraits in graphite, I was finally asked by many here and many artists that I worked with at VF imagewear (Vanity Fair) in Tampa, FL to show what I could do with paint. I decided to give it a "whack." The portrait "painting" I did was the first one in over 35 years. The last one was in art school in 1971. I decided to work in acrylics first. This is it. It is Allan Baker as Buffalo Bill Cody. The piece is 16" x 20". Sorry Allen, I don't know my metrics very well.
But back to the oils, I did not know the first thing about how to even start. Out of the 40 plus artists I worked with at VF, there were maybe only 5-6 of us that were full-blown illustrators or painters. They told me what to buy, what to mix with the oils and I was totally on my own. I had to figure it all myself. That is why I pretty much tell anyone that I am a "self-taught" artist. Matter of fact, no one ever taught me anything about picking up a pencil and drawing. I figured out that myself as well.
I paint strictly in oils now. Every once-in-a-while I am asked to do a pencil study for one of my oil portraits. The owner of the Steelers likes these. I am not going to tell him no. Not with what he offers me to do them.
Even painting in oils for my commission work, I still find that the "slow" drying of the oils does not slow me down. Being a "graphic artist" first and foremost, I find myself painting on a large, tilted drawing desk and not an easel. I have a tool that I designed that spans my 1/8" Masonite "Gessobords" which enables me to rest my hand a 1/4" above my wet paint. If it was not for this steady rest, I would never be able to keep painting let alone hold my hand steady enough to get the detail I want. Here is one of my most detailed piece in "traditional oils." "Fringe from hell" is what I named this one, just in my head that is! This piece is 18" x 24".
Denny ;{
The great thing to discover artist like you is that I feel deep down that ... I have to work even harder to get the quality I am looking for.
Sometimes, people have 3 photos of there kids and want theme together in the same picture ! Those people don't want any artistic extravagance but a photo's like portrait of the 3 kids together ! Sad maybe for the artist but costumer is the boss !
Sometime you have people (like the last picture I show you) who want the kid with a costume. Of course, the photo they give you have no costume at all ! You have to make it up and make it realistic !
And more you have order like this and less you think about artistic like portrait. Or you always draw or paint this way and costumes come to you the the same ! I don't no.. what do you think Per ?
since i use a mechanical pencil, the lead in the one i use the most is 0.7mm...i don't know how the softness-hardness rating works on that... sometimes, i do use an art pencil 4b, 5b or 8b for the darker areas...
Trying to make a piece of art better than the photo has ALWAYS been my main objective. The more you know about things, like how shadows are cast, how cloth folds react with each other, local color, etc, the better you can "bring out" or "accentuate" those kind of things. Just like you did with those wonderful spots of light hitting this beauty's face created from her knit hat. This piece of yours, is one of my favorites Allan.
BTW, thanks for all the great comments you posted on my work. Thanks to you too, Minnie!
This painting is my very lastest one (just finish this morning). I think that I would have to come back on it to finish this t-shirt and her back. It's not very clean.
Your welcome for my comment on your work ! :)
Denny
I agree that some photographers can create iconic powerful images. But i feel the magical quality of photographs only work because the viewer of the finished work is projecting experiences and memories on to the image. And the quality of the image is dependant on how much it attracts this from the eye.
Painting is different because the final work is an accumulation of experience and ability, a language in itself manifested in the medium. Painting often expresses the inexpressable, which is why abstract art was so important.
To me painting is like archeology in reverse, it adds layers of history and experience, rather than chipping away layers.
Photography is a useful tool for me when using it for source material, as in using sketches for a painting. Though if someone is going to paint directly from a photograph i think they should add a personal flair and a personal expression, rather than trying to copy exactly, otherwise the painting becomes a weaker version of the photograph.
i'll be interested to hear any ideas relating to my views.
Back to Category
Reply