25 November, 2006
  • ArtWanted.com Staff
  • 670 Views
  • 17 Comments

Change in Blocking Feature

Due to the recent issues with member blocking/banning, we have changed how this function works on our message boards.

1) The first change is that blocked members will only be blocked from replying to a post that was started by the member that is blocking them. We will no longer block members from talking within a thread right after each other.

2) The second change is that we are now limiting the number of people you can block to five (5). If you are trying to block more than 5 people on our site, then there are bigger issues that need to be dealt with that the blocking feature will not fix.

If you already have more than 5 people blocked, we will give you until Dec. 1st to decide which 5 you want to keep on your list. After this date, we will remove all blocked members except for 5.

3) The third change is that you can only add one person to your blocked list each day.

The block/ban feature was created because some members had an issue of Internet stockers and needed to eliminate communication with this person. Since then, it's been used to play games and to block people that you simply don't like. This is not the purpose of the ban feature.

This is also a good time to remind everyone to keep personal attacks off the message boards. Any negative comment toward a specific member will be considered a 'personal attack'. Those found slamming other members can be temporarily or permanently banned from the message boards. If you have been attacked on the message boards, please report it to us and do not reply to the attack.

We hope that these changes will reduce the recent number of issues we have had with the blocking feature.

Reply

17 Comments

Kari Franklin 25 Nov 2006

I do realize that you are not in an enviable position as far as such things go and for what it's worth, I think you're being as fair as possible to as many as possible with these new changes to the blocking feature.

Thank you :-) and keeping my fingers crossed that these modifications will keep things down to a dull roar ;-)

Leigh Karchner 25 Nov 2006

Thank you AW. It seems you are being extremely fair here and are really making an effort to encourage a more balanced communication (or lack thereof) between members. It's very much appreciated.

invisible 25 Nov 2006

jim rownd 25 Nov 2006

wow! look at that...an invisible post after Leighs.

cool

Patrick Miller 25 Nov 2006

The dawn of a new day....interesting.

Now if you could just get rid of the three people responsible for this, we could end this chapter of history. For if you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it. They know who they are, the ones play acting with each other...it is really obvious.

Leigh Karchner 25 Nov 2006

I would love nothing better than to post the lovely emails Denny and I are receiving in response to this..... but I won't. I'm satisfied with the outcome so far. Post away!

Patrick Miller 25 Nov 2006

Anyone who could make fun from another human being in a scary, potentially dangerous situation, or being a person who supports that type of conduct is the LOWEST FORM OF LIFE ON EARTH.

People like that disgust me. And they get an appropriate amount of regard from me....none.

I say kick their ass off the site. To do anything else is condoning unforgiveable behaviour. I am sorry if some of the stink splashed on anyone by being too close to the source. But it will never wash off...you will always stink to me.

Birds of a feather flock together?

The apple doesn't fall far from the tree?

Whatever works for you....

joan warburton 25 Nov 2006

Thanks AW!

Charles Oliver 25 Nov 2006

Ive never blocked anyone but myself. Does this mean I can't block myself anymore?

Betty Schwartz 25 Nov 2006

Dear AW.

Maybe I just don't get it, but if you mean what I THINK you mean, the word is not "stockers", but "stalkers".

Chris Callahan 25 Nov 2006

I suppose I made the mistake of reading through some of insane ranting in the threads. It would be nice if you addressed our concerns about the person that started all this...does she simply get to say this garbage and get by with it? How lovely she got to spew vomitus for hour and hour while AW watched, and at least appears that they evidently condone this???? What was deleted???? I would now appreciate knowing just what was said that was deleted and by whom, anyone willing to email some enlightenment would be appreciated...AW.....You have got to be kidding me....

Bo Fransson 25 Nov 2006

Perhaps they meant stockings?

Chris Callahan 25 Nov 2006

Are they silk stockings...or racey fishnet ;)

bill luke 25 Nov 2006

Wow!

26 Nov 2006

Pete Miller 26 Nov 2006

Thanks AW...

invisible 26 Nov 2006

5+1=6>6=0-2=a + value, thus ending a need for blocks.

Reply