| Artist: | Sybille Sterk |
| Uploaded: | 07/11/05 |
| Gallery: | Illustration |
| Subject: | Fantasy/Mythical |
| Media: | Acrylic |
![]() (Image 35 of 191) Copyright © Sybille Sterk |
| NOTE: Only the last 10 comments are displayed below. Click here to view all 12 comments. | ||
| Date / Time | Name / Comments | |
| 04-Sep-06 12:54 PM |
Joanne Harvey My goodness Sybille!!Where have you been? I'm glad I found you! You'r art work is unique and MARVELOUS! You'r use of color is fantastic! I have gone through you'r portfolio and it is all amaizing! THIS picture...I LOVE! I'm going to put you on my watch list. Keep it up...It's all fabulous!...Joanne | |
| 06-Feb-06 08:42 AM |
Herman Serrano These have such a lovley feel to them!!! | |
| 15-Aug-05 12:44 PM |
monique cooper Awesome Work!!!!!!!!!!:) | |
| 21-Jul-05 11:56 PM |
Christine brand Lady of the Fine Forest Foliage Green Satin Sheen, Quiet Serene, barely seen except for the light of her sleepy eyes gives a hint of her delicate disguise!!! Your work is unigue n ever so tender... n inspiring to me...so those words are for you and your loves. Stay well n blessed n happy! CB | |
| 11-Jul-05 07:34 PM |
Casey Catton Wow, what an acrylic...I though it was a digital (is so smooth). Really intense...sorta eery...yet beautiful at the same time! | |
| Artist Reply: Thanks for your comment Casey. The image is digital, however I work in Painter which emulates traditional methods (in this case acrylics) and printed out you can barely tell the difference. I always put "tradigital" with the image description to let people know it's digitally created traditional work. :-) | ||
| 11-Jul-05 04:54 PM |
georgia brown Beautiful work Sybille! | |
| 11-Jul-05 03:46 PM |
thea walstra Very lovely and well executed work Sybille | |
| 11-Jul-05 11:38 AM |
Diana Hume I'm not clear if you do this with paint, or on the computer? She is a beauty!! | |
| Artist Reply: Hi Diana, Thanks for your comment. I am using Corel Painter so my work is strictly speaking digital, however, Painter emulates traditional methods and does it so well that I always put the traditional method in the category. Unfortunately, there is no "tradigital" category or I'd put it in there. However, I feel that my stuff is very different from "normal" digital stuff so it doesn't fit in there. | ||