|
09/26/06 11:58AM |
but I plan on doing it today so hopefully you can help before I declare them done... don't worry this one won't cause epiliepsy, just a desire to go to the pub...
Scott Clendaniel | |||
|
09/26/06 11:59AM |
sorry that was a really small picture go to my website I will be posting a critique there as well if you would like to see it bigger, www.scottclendaniel.com
| |||
|
09/26/06 1:59PM |
Well in this one case I will excuse you Scott, and for once I have been to someones site from a link posted here. :D I can tell you straight away what is missing, some of them need the froth trailing down the side of the glass, and some misting over as if they are ice cold :D I think that is the widest and narrowest painting I've yet seen though LOL! It's definitely one that needs us to stand well back from it, in order to get the full impact.
| |||
|
09/26/06 3:37PM |
sorry I have been having problems putting a crit board up on my site totally under conststuction.. what you are actually looking at here is a group of ten paintings, that are supposed to go order from darkest to lightest.. Scott C
| |||
|
09/26/06 3:50PM |
I like it! The Denver Art Museum (DAM) has a group of 8x8 paintings of grass and grasses that this reminds me of. I love the concept. FYI - seems finished to me.
| |||
|
09/27/06 2:59PM |
Now I understand Scott, perhaps you don't need to add the extra touches then :)
| |||
|
09/29/06 9:16PM |
I finished the series just needed more details... it is nice when that is all that is really wrong.. sorry i won't post them all as i shot them diferently this time here is the double chocolate stout, mmmm
Scott Clendaniel | |||
| ||||
Please post a small critique (reply) in order to help the artist improve and get feedback.After all, you are surfing the critique's area of our website aren't you? | ||||