ArtWanted.com Home Login View My Cart
Image Search:  
Browse Shop Search Join Community Art Feed Members Area

 
 
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Delicious Share via E-mail More Sharing Options

This artist is featured in the
ArtWanted.com 2011 Calendar
ArtWanted.com 2012 Calendar

Home  »  Browse  »  Julia Scorupsky  »  Artist Blog
Gallery | Store | Slide Show | Biography | My Blog

 
To the question of continuity of tradition in the history of art, from Leonardo to Pollock. From the book by Andre Chastel "The Genius of Leonardo Da Vinci" (translation Copyright 1961, by the Orion Press, Inc; Copyright Club de Libraires de France, 1960): "... Leonardo gives the painter his secret - what Leonardo calls... the informed sketch. Contrary to all tradition, this consists of putting down on paper the mass of forms dictated by the unconscious without first working out the details. It is objectified when the painter daydreams before confused stains and splashes on old walls, and it is intended to make the observation more pliable and to give practice to the rapid interpretation of the inexhaustible depths of things." "... this secret permits him to freeze the instant at which the mind feels actively connected with the totality of things, for this "chaos" that the artist projects and explores on paper is like an outcry from nature itself." "This discovery throws some light on the fate that led Leonardo to leave several important works unfinished. The importance of these statements is confirmed by Leonardo's decision, about 1501 or 1502, to introduce non-completeness (non finito) into painting in order to enhance its fullness. Finally, it should not be overlooked that the master who sets such store by the possibilities of the informed sketch, takes pleasure in the drawings of his last years in the swirling and roiling visions of catastrophies and cosmic disasters that turn even chaos and the blind forces of the universe into the final aims of his art." "The conclusion of the unprecedented effort to be objective - to embrace the structure of things, the organization of forms, and the perfection of relief - is the final triumph of the subjective".

Response by: Anonymous Visitor
Cancel

Reply 12/25/11
06:03 AM

12/25/2011

Thanks a lot for your responses to my blog messages! Would be nice to know who sends them in order to respond adequately! But THANK YOU for visiting, anyway!


02/12/12
06:21 AM

5snx95 Post brought me to think, went to mull over!!... -
03/08/12
05:06 AM

agp8dl I appreciate you sharing this blog post.Thanks Again. -
01/04/13
09:42 AM

I admire your respect for tradition and meaning in art, and share your enjoyment in exploring the borderground between abstract and representational art! - steve kearney
Reply 06/13/11
03:39 PM

Click for larger view 05.13.2011

Trying to convey physical presence or rather physical impression of the subject... This one is Rain Forest (Puerto Rico).


03/09/12
02:34 AM

HecYIb Appreciate you sharing, great post.Really thank you! Really Great. -
Reply 05/09/11
03:30 PM

On the question of freedom in art... Is it really necessary?

Once, a group of American vanguard artists (I believe, they belonged to the New York School) send a telegram to P. Picasso (who lived in France at that time) asking the latter to support their efforts to "liberate" art, in other words, "break the ice", let artists have the utmost freedom of expression by removing any sort of restrictions/rules in the process of creation.

Picasso refused to give his support to this way of thinking. He argued (and his words were recorded by his mistress Francoise Gilot), that art is strong when it has to struggle against academic rules set by a classical school of art. This fight between the old (academic) school and the new (modern) art - is what gives art strength, and this is what pushes it forward. If there is no struggle - there is no movement, art simply does not have the necessary firm ground to push off!

For Jackson Pollock, for instance, such a springboard was his teacher Thomas Benton. Pollock was able to push off his master very far to get where he got and to become what he finally became.

In the meantime, Pollock himself left no ground for the future artists by his "breaking the ice"...

Do we need a time machine to go back in the past and, maybe, try to restore the Academy???


12/24/11
03:09 PM

It's really great that pelope are sharing this information. -
12/25/11
05:11 PM

Always the best content from these prodigious wirtres. -
03/09/12
02:14 AM

u441uw Enjoyed every bit of your post.Really thank you! Really Great. -
Reply 06/08/09
08:36 PM

To the question of continuity of tradition in the history of art, from Leonardo to Pollock.

From the book by Andre Chastel "The Genius of Leonardo Da Vinci" (translation Copyright 1961, by the Orion Press, Inc; Copyright Club de Libraires de France, 1960):

"... Leonardo gives the painter his secret - what Leonardo calls... the informed sketch. Contrary to all tradition, this consists of putting down on paper the mass of forms dictated by the unconscious without first working out the details. It is objectified when the painter daydreams before confused stains and splashes on old walls, and it is intended to make the observation more pliable and to give practice to the rapid interpretation of the inexhaustible depths of things."

"... this secret permits him to freeze the instant at which the mind feels actively connected with the totality of things, for this "chaos" that the artist projects and explores on paper is like an outcry from nature itself."

"This discovery throws some light on the fate that led Leonardo to leave several important works unfinished. The importance of these statements is confirmed by Leonardo's decision, about 1501 or 1502, to introduce non-completeness (non finito) into painting in order to enhance its fullness. Finally, it should not be overlooked that the master who sets such store by the possibilities of the informed sketch, takes pleasure in the drawings of his last years in the swirling and roiling visions of catastrophies and cosmic disasters that turn even chaos and the blind forces of the universe into the final aims of his art."

"The conclusion of the unprecedented effort to be objective - to embrace the structure of things, the organization of forms, and the perfection of relief - is the final triumph of the subjective".


Reply 05/18/09
11:45 AM

"Artist should be alone..." (L. da Vinci)

"When you're alone you possess everything, when you're together you possess only a half..." (L.da Vinci)


05/04/11
09:44 AM

Thanks alot - your answer solevd all my problems after several days struggling -
Reply 05/18/09
11:41 AM

Click for larger view My very first "serious" painting I made about 20 years ago.


12/24/11
08:49 AM

It's great to read something that's both enjoyable and provides pragmatisdc soultnios. -
Reply 11/21/08
06:09 PM

11.21.08 Art doesn't need any meaning from the outside; meaning emerges from the art itself.


Reply 11/18/08
08:00 PM

11/18/08 And how about mocking at the post-modern culture? Mocking at the mockery itself?? Is this the way?


Reply 11/18/08
05:31 PM

Click for larger view 11/18/08 I keep returning to this issue of the art future. Hope it alarms not only me. Where is art, specifically painting, going? Is it dead indeed, as the forecast goes?

I can't believe it; I believe it will live as long as natural human emotions and feelings exist.

What will come after post-modernism??? This is the question.

Since post-modernism is the extreme, there seems to be nowhere else to go, I feel that art will come back, meaningfulness, emotion, sentimentalism should come back as the opposite of what we have now.

However, the face of art will be different, it will absorb all previous experience and rise to a new level. I think new artists should make use of everything that has been worked out by previous generations, post-modernism being not an exclusion.

I try to employ "dripping", "finger", "air brush". "splashing", collage - all sorts of techniques (and ideas!) - to produce representational, meaningful, emotional, deep (in its classical sense) art. To me, this is the way out of the absurdity and chaos we have today.


12/24/11
08:24 AM

Thouhgt it wouldn't to give it a shot. I was right. -
12/25/11
09:09 PM

Yours is a clever way of tikhnnig about it. -
12/08/12
01:43 PM

Great article. Ill return for more content! -
Reply 03/31/08
09:31 PM

03/31/08 I think that at least one feature that distinguishes REAL ART from a fake is ... PAINSTAKING... there should be smth that makes artist struggle for, try to achive. Otherwise, art is impotent, and the goal is too easy to achieve.


05/03/11
01:16 PM

I'm out of league here. Too much brain power on dsiplay! -
12/24/11
08:44 AM

With the bases loaded you srtcuk us out with that answer! -
12/25/11
09:05 PM

Do you have more great atricels like this one? -
PAGE: 1 | 2 | Next

replica watches fake watches christian louboutin shoes christian louboutin sale ugg boots